http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2008/04/kagan_hellspark.php Comments on Kagan, Janet: Hellspark (re-read) en Copyright 2008 Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:47:43 -0500 http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.36 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss David Tate wrote on April 7, 2008 at 12:27 PM: <p>R.I.P., Ms Kagan. Two or three gems beats a boatload of mediocrity.</p> <p>Kate, do you have a citation for discussion of natural languages that include evidentiary status in the grammar? I'd be very interested to see that.</p> <p>David</p> http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2008/04/kagan_hellspark.php#c107781 Kate wrote on April 7, 2008 at 12:35 PM: <p>It came up in a <a href="http://www.teach12.com/ttcx/coursedesclong2.aspx?cid=1600&">lecture</a> I was listening to. The phrase I remember is "evidential markers," which leads me to the Wiki article on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidentiality">evidentiality</a>, which may or may not be a place to start.</p> http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2008/04/kagan_hellspark.php#c107783 David Tate wrote on April 8, 2008 at 3:27 PM: <p>Excellent! Thanks, Kate. "Evidentiary" only got me legal discussions :-).</p> http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2008/04/kagan_hellspark.php#c107893