<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Outside of a Dog: Vinge, Vernor: Rainbows End</title>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2007/07/vinge_rainbows.php</link>
<description>Comments on Vinge, Vernor: Rainbows End</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 10:47:43 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.36</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>David Tate</title>
<description>David Tate wrote on July 21, 2007 at 12:27 PM: &lt;p&gt;I was actually relieved that &lt;i&gt;Rainbows End&lt;/i&gt; was not ambitious on the scale of &lt;i&gt;A Fire Upon the Deep&lt;/i&gt; or &lt;i&gt;A Deepness in the Sky&lt;/i&gt;.  I'm not often in the mood for such heavy books these days, and when they miss they miss badly for me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I enjoyed &lt;i&gt;RE&lt;/i&gt; with reservations.  Most of those reservations have to do with [rot-13] gur oyvgur nffhzcgvba gung creinfvir vzzrefvir iveghny ernyvgl, vapyhqvat gnpgvyr vyyhfvba, vfa'g gung uneq -- juvpu V guvax vf syntenag penc.  Pbagnpg yrafrf naq fzneg 'cebcf' pna'g cbffvoyl jbex gung jryy, ng gur grpu yriry fubja, naq ynfref rireljurer unir qenjonpxf.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, that said, I did enjoy the book.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2007/07/vinge_rainbows.php#c81574</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kate</title>
<description>Kate wrote on July 21, 2007 at  3:53 PM: &lt;p&gt;David: I'd seen some comments along the lines of yours before, and frankly I just don't care. The precise point in time where the story is located, and the plausibility of the predictions about that point of time, interest me very little, because I don't read fiction for a crystal ball.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2007/07/vinge_rainbows.php#c81578</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>David Tate</title>
<description>David Tate wrote on July 21, 2007 at  6:24 PM: &lt;p&gt;Kate: Fair enough; I'm hardly one to complain that someone isn't taking science seriously enough, and I certainly didn't mean to imply that you (or anyone else) should like &lt;i&gt;RE&lt;/i&gt; less than you did.  I love Lee &amp; Miller, for heaven's sake, so realistic tech can't be that important to me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For me, though, there's a difference between near-future tech that feels possible but unlikely, versus near-future tech that feels impossible.  I guess I would say that near-future settings come with a tacit guarantee that the near-future setting follows from the current present with minimal miracles required -- or, at least, with only The Big Miracle that introduces that novel's particular McGuffin.  Chronoliths from the future?  No problem, in the service of a good enough story.  Pbagnpg yrafrf gung bireynl ivfvba-dhnyvgl vzntrf ba gurynaqfpncr nebhaq lbh?  Nope, I can't buy it, unless they're the whole point of the story.  And, as you noted, Vinge had already used up his miracle quota in the social setting.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2007/07/vinge_rainbows.php#c81581</link>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>