<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Outside of a Dog: Jerome, Jerome K.: Three Men in a Boat (audio)</title>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2006/05/jerome_jerome_k.php</link>
<description>Comments on Jerome, Jerome K.: Three Men in a Boat (audio)</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:07:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.36</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Jean</title>
<description>Jean wrote on June  5, 2006 at  5:34 AM: &lt;p&gt;I love &lt;cite&gt;Three Men in a Boat&lt;/cite&gt;, but you're right, it's all in the tone and the humour, and if they don't work for you, then no amount of rational exposition will convince you.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And I can imagine Martin Jarvis reading it very well indeed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And yes, towing a boat works pretty much as described. It depends on the waterway being either a canal, or a canalised river (full depth immediately next to the banks), and the progress is slow but very steady. The canals pre-date railways as a way of shifting loads of heavy materials (like coal) or fragile ones (pottery), sometimes pulled by a horse. But even a young couple with their minds on other rthings can pull a boat with very little effort once they get it moving (inertia is on your side, for once).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2006/05/jerome_jerome_k.php#c5557</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kate</title>
<description>Kate wrote on June  5, 2006 at  7:11 PM: &lt;p&gt;Jean: thanks. In the absence of rail, I guess I can see it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There's a sequel that I never hear discussed; do you know if it's any good?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2006/05/jerome_jerome_k.php#c5571</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Septentrionalis</title>
<description>Septentrionalis wrote on July  3, 2006 at  2:23 PM: &lt;p&gt;It's been a while since I've read &lt;i&gt;Three Men on the Bummel&lt;/i&gt;, and I remember being amused, but none of the contents. So the answer is probably: Sort of good. &lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2006/05/jerome_jerome_k.php#c7412</link>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>