If you're seeing this, you're deliberately surfing with CSS off (as I've been known to do), or you're using an old browser (in which case you might consider upgrading your browser.)

Friday, February 20, 2004

Some time ago, I needed a novel to read at lunch, and found Whose Body?, the first Lord Peter Wimsey novel by Dorothy Sayers, in the work paperback exchange. "Ah-ha!" I said, "I will start re-reading Sayers over lunches when I need a break, and this will give me an excuse to fill the inexplicable holes in my collection: as I get to a book I don't own, I can buy it." And that is just what I did.

I'd read this before, of course, and so whodunnit was blindingly obvious from the very beginning. I suspect it would be a fairly obvious mystery to new readers, too, even if their edition didn't have a spoilery blurb. I was more interested in how different this book is from later ones, such as Gaudy Night, which I re-read not so long ago. The main thing, of course, is Peter, who is much less rounded than he becomes. I don't say that he's flat, because I liked him from the start and he does have the shell-shock; and I utterly deny that he's a Mary Sue (per some at a Boskone panel), because to include him in the category renders the term nearly meaningless. But the strong prominence of his verbal tics makes him appear rather more a caricature than in later books. (I'd noted this with reference to Strong Poison as well, but I think it's even more pronounced here.)

The other major difference I noticed—even different from Strong Poison, I think—is the narration. Or, rather, the narrator, who is a palpable presence: footnotes, for goodness' sake, as well as that odd dip into second-person towards the end (which chapter I really like). I'll be interested to see how this evolves over my re-reads.

(The only problem with my lunchtime-reading plan is that I was given a copy of The Lord Peter Wimsey Companion as a birthday present last year. On one hand, it rather defeats the purpose to not have it at hand when reading the books, but on the other, I really don't want to bring it into work. I suppose I shall just have to make notes or use sticky-flags when necessary; I didn't really see anything in Whose Body? that I wanted to look up.)

[ For excellent, very spoilery commentary on Whose Body?, I recommend Truepenny's LiveJournal post; all of her thoughts on re-reading Sayers are linked to from this "memories" page. ]


Comments:

#1 :: Pam wrote on February 23, 2004 at 12:05 PM:

Surely if anybody's a Mary Sue in the Wimsey stories, it's Harriet Vane?

(I'm not saying she is one, just that if any of the characters is an idealized auctorial stand-in, it's Vane.)


#2 :: Kate wrote on February 23, 2004 at 10:58 PM:

No kidding--she's a _mystery_ _novelist_, for goodness' sake. That's a side reason that the accusations of Mary Sue-dom against Peter annoy me: attempting to shoehorn Peter into the category, when there's a much more obvious candidate available, seems more like a vendetta than reasoned critique (and now I'm exaggerating for effect, but you know what I mean).

I don't think Harriet is a Mary Sue either, but I could make a heck of a lot better case for her than for Peter.


Subscribe to comments on this post: RSS feed


Post a comment:




(HTML permitted for links and formatting):

Remember Me?


« Kelly, Carla: Miss Grimsley's Oxford Career | Main | Snicket, Lemony: (04-06) The Miserable Mill (audio... »


Main
About
ROT-13

Change Page Style

Search: (advanced)

Browse:

By Category:

By Recent Comments:

By Entry: Random, All

By Date (text list):

Syndicate: