<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Outside of a Dog: Rowling, J.K.: (05) Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix</title>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2003/08/rowling_jk_05_h.php</link>
<description>Comments on Rowling, J.K.: (05) Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:07:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.36</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Chad Orzel</title>
<description>Chad Orzel wrote on August 12, 2003 at 10:38 PM: &lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;A minor diversion is Harry's relationship with Cho. Some people vehemently insist these few scenes are childish and unrealistic; this attitude frankly baffles me, as I thought they were absolutely spot-on depictions of adolescent awkwardness.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I didn't think they were especially unrealistic, but they had a &quot;Oh, crap, I need to get this out of the way&quot; feel about them. There've been hints of a Harry-Cho romance for a couple of books now-- a couple of &lt;b&gt;long&lt;/b&gt; books-- and then the whole thing was disposed of in something like four really perfunctory scenes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2003/08/rowling_jk_05_h.php#c3844</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Mike Kozlowski</title>
<description>Mike Kozlowski wrote on August 12, 2003 at 10:49 PM: &lt;p&gt;Congratulations:  You've just made me want to read this book even less than I already did.  When the sole redeeming virtue of a series is its bubbly fluffiness, making it all dark isn't going to do much for me.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; (I don't want dirge metal from the Spice Girls, either.)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2003/08/rowling_jk_05_h.php#c3845</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kate</title>
<description>Kate wrote on August 12, 2003 at 11:18 PM: &lt;p&gt;Chad: feeling like things have been perfunctorily dismissed has annoyed me in other books (_Lady Knight_, for Tamora Pierce readers), so I can understand the feeling. Considering the non-deep relationship here (a crush based on looks alone), the time spent on it worked for me, but YM does V.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Mike: Obviously, I disagree about sole redeeming virtues, but I'd rather spend the energy in nagging you to read the Dortmunder books.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2003/08/rowling_jk_05_h.php#c3846</link>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>