Conan Doyle, Arthur: (07) The Valley of Fear

I picked up the next Sherlock Holmes novel on my list, The Valley of Fear, because it seemed like it would be a good soothing read in times of uncertainty. As far as that went, it worked okay, but it really wasn’t that good a book. It started out in a promising fashion, with talk of Moriarty (obviously, this is a prequel), but shortly devolves into a fairly predictable murder mystery. I don’t know if Doyle was being really obvious, or I’m getting used to how Holmes stories work, but I was with Holmes all the way on the deductions. And then, once the murder is solved, we head into a long backstory exposition, chock full of lurid secret societies and star-crossed lovers and ocean-spanning vengeance. Excuse me, but we’ve done this already, and it wasn’t all that good in A Study in Scarlet, either.

*sigh* I want more Moriarty, and I’m not going to get it, at least not in Doyle’s works.

3 Comments

Lightman, Alan: Einstein’s Dreams

After going to the Einstein exhibit at the American Museum of Natural History, I picked up Einstein’s Dreams, by Alan Lightman, for a re-read. This is a series of fictional vignettes about Einstein’s dreams about different kinds of time, which was moderately well-known when it was published. The last time I’d read it, I was confused about which of the vignettes was our reality; I thought there were two possibilities. This time I spotted the right one immediately; turns out that the other one I was thinking of had the right general idea, but on a wildly incorrect scale.

This is a very short book, with prose that approaches poetry at points. I enjoy it for its unusual extrapolations of the social effects of different forms of time; many of them are improbable (like ours), but they do display imagination, and there’s some nice images. Harmless way to pass half an hour.

No Comments

Elrod, P.N.: (03-04) Bloodcircle; Art in the Blood

I picked up Bloodcircle, the third book in P.N. Elrod’s Vampire Files, one night when I was waiting for the dregs of a horrible headache to pass so I could sleep. It’s short, it moves quickly, and Jack gets beat up routinely, so he feels worse than I did. In this book, Jack continues his search for the woman who made him a vampire, and we meet Jonathan Barrett, another vampire who has his own series. I have no interest in reading historical novels with Barrett, but I was interested enough in what happens to him in this time frame to pick up the next book the day after, Art in the Blood. However, Barrett doesn’t actually appear in this one; we seemed to have moved off of the beginning arc in the series (Jack is turned into a vampire and deals with it) into, possibly, one-shot mysteries. The plot of this one is basically unrelated to the prior books (though the emotional resonances from prior books remain), and a fairly standard, perfectly serviceable murder mystery it is. I have no great urge to read the next one, but I will someday.

No Comments

Pierce, Tamora: (208) Shatterglass

I bought Tamora Pierce’s Shatterglass, the last book in the Circle Opens quartet, while at Boskone, but didn’t complete a proper read for a while after that. This is as good as the first two, and considerably better than Cold Fire. This series is structured around two aspects of magework: discovering and teaching one’s first student, and the use of magic in forensics. In this book, Tris’s student is a grown man whose skill as a glassblower has been strangely warped after he was struck by lightning. He learns that he has both glass and lightning magic, with a strange precongitive aspect: sometimes his glass globes show crime scenes, including those of a serial killer preying on his community.

I’m really tired and not thinking of much else to say about this book. If you liked the prior books in the series, you’ll like this one, and really, that’s about it.

No Comments

Conover, Ted: Newjack: Guarding Sing Sing

Newjack: Guarding Sing Sing, by Ted Conover, is one of my rare nonfiction reads. My job prompted me to get this out of the library: I have a lot of cases brought by prisoners, and while I’ve learned a lot about the working of prisons in the last few months, I thought it couldn’t hurt to get some more information. This was written by a journalist who spent a year undercover as a corrections officer, going through the academy and then working in Sing Sing.

This was a good book, though it didn’t tell me much more than I already knew. If I’d read it earlier, I would have found it more helpful: it does a nice job explaining how the popular conception of prison life is considerably different than the reality. (That popular conception, by the way, can make defending corrections officers rather tricky.) Well, okay, it told me that Sing Sing is a damn difficult prison to run, since it’s so old. I’m more familiar with the newer medium and maximum security facilities, which are much less chaotic.

I skipped a few chapters here and there, because this needed to go back to the library, but what I did read was well-written and interesting. One lunch during trial, I asked our defendants (six corrections officers) what they thought of it. Interestingly, not all of them had read it, but they’d all heard good things about it. This doesn’t surprise me, as my impression of it was that it was trying hard to be an honest and balanced look at the author’s experiences, both internal and external. It’s not a deep philosophical look at the problems of the corrections system, but it’s quite good at what it does. Recommended.

1 Comment

Stout, Rex: (46) A Family Affair

We found A Family Affair, the final Nero Wolfe & Archie Goodwin book by Rex Stout, in a used bookstore a few weeks ago; in honor of the purchase, I re-read it. (Only two Wolfe books left to find and buy now—we’re getting there.)

The first time I read this, the most notable thing was the ending—those who’ve read it will doubtless know what I mean. This time, I really noticed how much the narration reflects the nature of the story. Normally, even when bad things are happening, Archie’s First Person Smartass Narration is ornamented with clever descriptions or turns of phrase that keep it fairly light. This time, the prose is really stripped-down and bleak: it seems to me that there’s more dialogue-only sections and much less description by Archie. The prose creates an additional level of tension that really propels the story—enough so that I read it all at once before bed, which had not been my intention.

The other thing I found interesting about this one is Archie & Lily. We get much more insight into their relationship here than in almost any of the others; for whatever reason, Archie spends a lot more time reflecting on it than in other books. Also, it’s much more palatable than what we saw in, for instance, Not Quite Dead Enough.

While most of the series stands alone, this would be a terrible place to start reading. (So would In the Best Families.) Go read some of the others first, such as Prisoner’s Base, one of my favorites and recently back in print. Save this one for the end, but do read it.

1 Comment

Robb, J.D.: (16) Portrait in Death

I drop everything when a new J.D. Robb novel comes out, so I finished Portrait in Death next after Feet of Clay. This came out after Boskone, and I was vastly amused to see that a number of comments people had made at the J.D. Robb panel were addressed here. In particular, Roarke gets pretty thoroughly knocked off balance in this one, which was well overdue, in many people’s opinions (including mine).

My only real complaint about this one is that the brief sections from the killer’s point of view aren’t necessary; not only that, but I think they’re a touch misleading. I don’t know if it’s part of the genre that I’m not otherwise aware of, or something that Robb/Roberts just likes to do, but she seems to have the killer POV snippets in almost every book where there is a killer. I don’t see that it adds a whole lot, frankly.

Overall, this was an unusually solid entry in the series. Say what I will about some of Robb/Roberts’ craft details, she definitely has the storytelling instinct.

No Comments

Pratchett, Terry: (19) Feet of Clay

Continuing the re-read of Terry Pratchett’s Guards books, we have Feet of Clay. This is the third, after Guards! Guards! and Men at Arms. I generally think of this as one of my favorites. However, it rather suffers from being read in reasonably close proximity to the other two, because you really notice that this one hammers on the king theme, again. I had quite a good idea about Pratchett’s attitude towards monarchy after the first one, and an even better one after the second; the third is starting to feel like overkill. Other than that, this is another enjoyable police procedural. Someone’s poisoning the Patrician, and Vimes is on a rampage to figure it out: Vimes might hate the Patrician, after all, but the Patrician is Vimes’ to hate.

Things of note: Carrot continues his evolution towards superhumanity; we’re still getting his points of view, but not that many. I suspect we may lose his points of view completely in the next book, Jingo. I would really like to hear Pratchett’s explanation of Vetinari’s actions and motivations regarding the Watch; I can sort of make his attitude in these earlier books fit in with Night Watch, but it doesn’t quite work. And, on a lighter note, Nobby’s reaction at the end of the dinner party was absolutely perfect.

4 Comments

Roberts, Nora: Chesapeake Blue

How far behind am I on the booklog? So far behind that I was reading Nora Roberts’ Chesapeake Blue to decompress from packing the apartment to move into the new house: end of January, in other words.

[ If you’re curious as to what’s been taking up all my time, see my LiveJournal and the Miscellany page. ]

This is Roberts’ latest mainstream hardcover. I wasn’t planning on reading it; I didn’t know what it was about, but lately her mainstream hardcovers have been rather heavy on the random serial killers for my taste. Then, while looking for something else, I discovered that Chesapeake Blue was a sequel to the trilogy that ended with Inner Harbor, and focuses on Seth, who was a pre-teen at the time of those books. When I found this out, I said, “Well, heck, now I have to read this, which means waiting for the library to have it.”

A few weeks later, I was browsing the vendors at a book sale at work. One charity was selling funny small-sized hardcovers (book club editions?) for paperback prices, including Chesapeake Blue. Clearly, this was A Sign, so I purchased it and read it shortly thereafter.

It’s not true that if you’ve read one Nora Roberts book, you’ve read them all. However, once you’ve read lots of Nora Roberts books, as I have, you pretty much know what you’re getting. Her strengths, as always, are her people and their families and other relationships. Her weaknesses tend to be in the details. For instance, there’s this conversation in Chapter One that positively screams as-you-know-Bob infodumping. An excerpt:

“ . . . The boat business is thriving. . . . Aubrey’s working there.”

“No kidding? . . . How’s she doing?”

“Terrific. She’s beautiful, smart, stubborn and, according to Cam, a genius with wood. I think Grace was a little disappointed when Aubrey didn’t want to pursue dancing, but it’s hard to argue when you see your child so happy. And Grace and Ethan’s Emily followed in her mother’s toe shoes.”

“She still heading to New York end of August?”

“A chance to dance with the American Ballet Company doesn’t come along every day. She’s grabbing it, and she swears she’ll be principal before twenty.”

I read that and said, “Good grief, even I can do better than that.” For my own amusement, a first pass at more subtle incluing follows:

“Did you hear that Aubrey has started working at the business?”

“No kidding? How’s she doing?”

“Cam says she’s a genius with wood.”

“How’s Grace taking it? Are they still butting heads over Aubrey pursuing dancing?”

“I think she was a little disappointed at first, but it’s hard to argue when you see your child so happy. And Emily’s big news took the pressure off Aubrey.”

“She leaves for New York pretty soon, right? Is she nervous?”

“August, and Emily, nervous? Are you kidding—this is the woman who insists she’s going to make principal by twenty. And you know, even though it’s the American Ballet Company, I wouldn’t want to bet against her.”

Enough self-indulgence. Once the plot gets started, the craft level smoothes out considerably, and the comfort read unfolds: all the family and friends from the prior trilogy are thriving, Seth deals with issues from his past and falls in love, and everyone ends up happy except for the villain—exactly what I needed during packing and moving.

There’s one other thing that struck my eye: the book is dedicated “To every reader who ever asked : When are you going to tell Seth’s story?” Now, call me crazy, but I rather think “rescued from evil biological mother by kindly people and given a home, family, and opportunity to develop your artistic talent, all before you hit puberty” is enough story for most people’s lives. The dedication’s phrasing, though, suggests that a person’s story is automatically their failling in love, which I found disconcerting. I don’t know what my story is, but I don’t think it’s only that—or that it has to be only that. (Yes, this is partly a function of the genre, and it’s possible that no deep thought was put into that phrasing, but as I said, I found it striking.)

(Hmm, I guess I wasn’t done with the self-indulgence after all.)

No Comments