If you're seeing this, you're deliberately surfing with CSS off (as I've been known to do), or you're using an old browser (in which case you might consider upgrading your browser.)

Wednesday, March 27, 2002

I was part-way through Ellis Peters' The Pilgrim of Hate when I took the romance detour. Coincidentally, when I went back to it, I discovered that the ObYoungLovers of this book broke a rule so basic I didn't think I had to write it down: Thou shalt not strike one's beloved in anger. They also reminded me of a corollary: "for his/her own good" is not one of the acceptable rationales for deception.

Besides those, which are fairly minor parts of the book and not egregious in any event, this is a pretty good one. The plot has a nifty concept at its core, and we get to see Olivier again. I do wonder, though, how much tension would be lost in reading these if you happened to know the ups and downs of the civil war between Maud and Stephen; for me, it's another layer of what-happens-next from book to book.


Comments:

#1 :: Kate wrote on March 28, 2002 at 1:45 PM:

Hmm. No more posting at midnight.

I meant to add that this is also the first book with a miracle. Surprisingly, this doesn't bother me; I think it's been cordoned off in my mind under "historical recreation of a world that isn't necessarily ours, or at least mine."


Subscribe to comments on this post: RSS feed


Post a comment:




(HTML permitted for links and formatting):

Remember Me?


« Roberts, Nora: Inner Harbor; [meta] Criteria for... | Main | Schroeder, Karl: Ventus »


Main
About
ROT-13

Change Page Style

Search: (advanced)

Browse:

By Category:

By Recent Comments:

By Entry: Random, All

By Date (text list):

Syndicate: