If you're seeing this, you're deliberately surfing with CSS off (as I've been known to do), or you're using an old browser (in which case you might consider upgrading your browser.)

Saturday, March 23, 2002

I'd wanted to re-read Robin McKinley's The Blue Sword back when I was looking for anti-sexist fiction, but none of the libraries nearby had a copy (shock! horror!). (I reviewed it a couple of years ago.) This time I was struck by how easily the plot elements could have fallen into cliché; they're saved as much by the understatedly wry narration, as by the carefully-built world and characters. I really like this, and hope that its repackaging as a YA novel doesn't cause readers to overlook it.


Comments:

#1 :: Pam wrote on March 24, 2002 at 12:13 PM:

*blink* "Re-packaging " as a YA novel? It's always been sold as a YA novel, hasn't it? I ordered it from aone of those Scholastic catalogs they passed out in school, way back when.

Anyway, The Blue Sword is one of my childhood favorites. I've always been a sucker for "plucky girl shows skeptical guys she's just as good as they are" plots, and this is one of the best examples of that genre.


#2 :: Kate wrote on March 24, 2002 at 8:58 PM:

Pam: The copy I have is not noticeably YA; it's an Ace Fantasy mmpb with a cover blurb from the Washington Post. I'm pretty sure I got it off the SF shelves. The most recent reprinting is one of those not-quite-trade sized formats, by Puffin, and is explicitly shelved in YA (I've seen it).

And I'd meant to say in my post and forgot: there is one place where the book clunks a bit, trying to use super-formal Tolkien-ese dialogue in a situation where I have trouble believing even Tolkien's use of the language. It's made more clunky by its contrast to the narrative style.


#3 :: Dave Hemming wrote on March 26, 2002 at 6:42 PM:

I haven't thought about The Blue Sword for ages... I read it when I was a "young adult", as I was on a Robin McKinley kick at the time. Plus the cover of the copy in our library was very cool.

I seem to recall it was very good - but I can't quite recall much about it now.


#4 :: Kate wrote on March 26, 2002 at 8:57 PM:

If you've gone allergic to "girl with horse" since, it might not work on a re-read for you; I read it first recently, but I'd venture to say that it would hold up pretty well for you now otherwise.


Subscribe to comments on this post: RSS feed


Post a comment:




(HTML permitted for links and formatting):

Remember Me?


« Watt-Evans, Lawrence: Touched by the Gods | Main | Stevermer, Caroline: Serpent's Egg, The »


Main
About
ROT-13

Change Page Style

Search: (advanced)

Browse:

By Category:

By Recent Comments:

By Entry: Random, All

By Date (text list):

Syndicate: