<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Outside of a Dog: Gaiman, Neil: (201) American Gods</title>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2002/02/gaiman_neil_201.php</link>
<description>Comments on Gaiman, Neil: (201) American Gods</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 21:07:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.36</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Trix</title>
<description>Trix wrote on June 12, 2003 at  1:13 PM: &lt;p&gt;This is well after the event, but I absolutely agree with your comments. My feeling throughout the book was that I really didn't give a toss what happened to any of the characters, most of whom, if they weren't passive, were obnoxious (although I suppose no-one ever said the gods were charming people). The premise is great, tho', and there are some momentarily funny bits. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Perhaps those who hype it are thinking it's great having something that references mythology, and actually, that part of the book is quite convincing. Personally, I need a bit more in plot and characterisation to keep me motivated. Diana Wynne Jones does a more entertaining job with Norse gods in 8 Days of Luke (in a novel half the size) - actually, I think she's one of Gaiman's influences.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2002/02/gaiman_neil_201.php#c3547</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Christy</title>
<description>Christy wrote on October 10, 2003 at  2:24 PM: &lt;p&gt;This novel was my first experience of Gaiman, and coming in with no expectations I found myself delighted.  Of course, give me a novel that makes me pull my mythology reference books off the shelf and I'm happy.  This struck me as very like the work of Roger Zelazny, whose passing I still mourn.  I like to speculate about how our archetypes deal with the world I live in.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; I hadn't noticed the passive protagonist aspect, but now that you've pointed it out, I agree that it is distressing to me and my worldview.  And now I remember that Richard in &lt;i&gt;Neverwhere&lt;/i&gt; was likewise annoyingly passive.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2002/02/gaiman_neil_201.php#c3548</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Harry</title>
<description>Harry wrote on March  5, 2007 at  8:59 AM: &lt;p&gt;Do you recall &quot;Chance the gardener&quot; from Jerzy Kosinski's 'Being there'? That Jesus-like vessel, from who everyone drew profound meaning in his child-like simplicity? A passive protagonist indeed! And, though I haven't finished this book (I only started it this weekend) I see much the same from Shadow's &quot;passivity&quot;; and, perhaps a certain parallel with that &quot;lucky son of a virgin&quot; as well?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2002/02/gaiman_neil_201.php#c70666</link>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kate</title>
<description>Kate wrote on March  5, 2007 at 12:33 PM: &lt;p&gt;Harry: I'm not familiar with that work, but I hope you'll report back when you're done (with appropriate spoiler protection--see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rot13.com/&quot;&gt;http://www.rot13.com/&lt;/a&gt;, for instance).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<link>http://www.steelypips.org/weblog/2002/02/gaiman_neil_201.php#c70671</link>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>