This page will look much nicer in a browser that supports CSS, or with CSS turned on.

The Library of Babel: A Book Log

"This much is already known: for every sensible line of straightforward statement, there are leagues of senseless cacophonies, verbal jumbles and incoherences." -- Jorge Luis Borges


Sunday, December 04, 2005

Gateway to the Epics?

In a comment to the previous post, Sean M. writes:

So, I know that there are probably lists out there like this, but is there any long-epic series that a beginner should start with?

I have never really read a long series of fantasy books, but I like the idea of it. I would start with the Wheel of Time series, but just about half of the people I hear mention it say bad things about it.

It's a harder question than you might think, even leaving aside the ethical issue of whether it's a good idea to encourage the reading of long epic series (which many people object to).

The fundamental problem with things like the Wheel of Time or George R. R. Martin's Song of Ice and Fire is that they're not finished. It's hard to recommend either on the grounds that they might still go completely off the rails (some would argue that Jordan went off the rails about four books ago). I wouldn't want to recommend something that's incomplete.

The other major problem with coming up with a "where to start" recommendation is that the series that were the real gateway drug for this sort of stuff mostly aren't very good. I thought David Eddings's Belgarion was great stuff when I was about twelve, but it doesn't hold up that well. And while I enjoyed it at the time, with a little perspective, you can just about hear the dice rolling in RPG-derived stuff like Raymond Feist's Riftwar and sequels. I even kind of liked Terry Brooks when I first encountered it.

(A further problem is that many of these authors just don't know when to let go, so a reasonable trilogy can be retroactively destroyed by unnecessary sequels.)

The obvious recommendation would probably be The Lord of the Rings, but it's not quite the same thing, despite some similarities. A lot of people who like Tolkien don't like other epic fantasy, while some epic fantasy readers really don't much care for Tolkien. I think this has less to do with the relative quality of the works in question than with the fact that they're not trying to do the same things, but that's a different discussion altogether.

There are also some books that are great if you've read a bunch of epic fantasy before, because they play some interesting games with the format and readers' expectations, but I don't think they'd work as an introduction to the form. Steven Erikson's Malazan books (The first of which is reviewed here) are in this category, as are Gene Wolfe's recent duology (The Knight and The Wizard).

So, I'm left with a bunch of things that sort-of work. Dave Duncan has a couple of series ("A Man of His Word" and "A Handful of Men") that are perfectly competent epic fantasy with all the usual trappings (different races, exploring most of the map, a Dark Lord who needs defeating). Guy Gavriel Kay's Fionavar Tapestry is sort of kitchen-sink epic fantasy, with a little bit of everything thrown in. It's got some lovely writing, but it's not entirely coherent. Susan Cooper's "young adult" series The Dark is Rising gets a lot of the flavor, though it's missing some of the elements of classic epic fantasy, and it's YA.

Comments and other suggestions are, of course, welcome. What am I forgetting?

Posted at 8:44 AM | link |
Warning: fopen(/home/khnepveu/public_html/library/blogkomm/comments.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home2/khnepveu/public_html/library/blogkomm/module/blogkomm_show_link.php on line 29
[ hide comments ]


As much as I love Duncan, I don't think it's quite fair to use that series as an intro to epic fantasy, because it's lighter in tone than most epic fantasy. Still, it is good, and it partakes enough of the genre that it's not insane to use it that way.

I would never, ever recommend Cooper to anyone. It's way too YA to be a real book.

Other possibilities:

1. Hobb's Assassin trilogy. It has the disadvantage of being insanely depressing, and going off the rails at the end for everyone who isn't Novak, but it's good.

2. Watt-Evans' Obsidian Chronicles are good, but they're not the sort of thing that's going to make people go "Wow!" and start raving wildly.

3. Stephenson's Baroque Cycle has the disadvantage of not actually being epic fantasy, but if what you're looking for is the immersive experience of reading a series of enormous bricks that cover a huge cast over a large period of time (which is much of the enjoyment of enormous epics), it delivers. Also, it's incredibly excellent.

4. Reading something like Elizabeth Moon's Paksenarrion books could actually work. They're insanely and madly generically derivative, but if you're unfamiliar with the stuff they're deriving from, you might not want to poke out your eyes while reading them.

5. Stephan Grundy's Rhinegold is a single book that still feels epic, so is maybe a low-key way to get started. Also, it's explicitly mythological, which some people might like.

Mike Kozlowski, 12.04.2005, 10:34am | permalink


Robin Hobb: The Farseer ,The Liveship Traders, The Tawny Man. The first two trilogies stand on their own. The third really needs the context of the first (but you can almost ignore the second completely).

Liveship Traders is probably the choice as a gateway.

Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn is the other epic that leaps to mind. If for no other reason than to practice skipping the POVs that you no longer care for.

Danil, 12.04.2005, 10:45am | permalink


Mike: As much as I love Duncan, I don't think it's quite fair to use that series as an intro to epic fantasy, because it's lighter in tone than most epic fantasy.

True, but Eddings isn't exactly Crime and Punishment. I basically think of those Duncan books as Eddings done better, so they mostly fit.

I would never, ever recommend Cooper to anyone. It's way too YA to be a real book.

Your allergy to YA fiction is stronger than most.

1. Hobb's Assassin trilogy. It has the disadvantage of being insanely depressing, and going off the rails at the end for everyone who isn't Novak, but it's good.

I thought about mentioning it, but it doesn't really become epic until the final book. The first book is much more small-scale, and has a different feel than your typical epic.

4. Reading something like Elizabeth Moon's Paksenarrion books could actually work. They're insanely and madly generically derivative, but if you're unfamiliar with the stuff they're deriving from, you might not want to poke out your eyes while reading them.

It might work. For me, the problem with these wasn't a genre thing, it's was the RPG aspect-- I was badly distracted by the sounds of dice rolling in the background.

Danil: Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn is the other epic that leaps to mind. If for no other reason than to practice skipping the POVs that you no longer care for.

Yeah. Those really need a drinking-game style user's manual: "If Simon is lost in a cave, tunnel, or forest, take two drinks, and skip ahead five pages..."

Chad Orzel, 12.04.2005, 11:02am | permalink


Probably the ultimate in the mega-novel would be all those books by Anthony Trollope, but I'm assuming by the books you've mentioned that we're limited here to something science fiction or fantasy-like.

How about Moorcock's Eternal Champion cycle, which is highly uneven but contains something for everyone. I always like the Elric ones (for showing off the anti-hero) and the Hawkmoon ones (for the political side).

Glen Engel-Cox, 12.04.2005, 11:27am | permalink


I've had some similar conversations with new readers recently, and been musing whether Eddings is really as bad I consider him to be.

My forgiving side would say that there has to be some reason I devoured his books at 12-15. I've wondered whether new readers, not familiar with the standard fantasy tropes, cliches and stereotypes, not mention less attuned to noticing plot holes and internal inconsistencies, might have the same reaction as my 12-year-old self.

Some of the books I've tried as gateway drugs:
- Robin Hobb's _Assassin Apprentice_ (mixed success)
- Elizabeth Moon's Paksenarrion trilogy (so far, 2 for 2; both were gamers, and Moon does a great job of taking starting with a D&Dish world and writing a real book on top of it)
- Steven Brust's _Jhereg_ (not an epic brick, but works if you're looking for 'big fantasy world with lots of sequels')
- Dave Duncan's _Man of His Word_ (mixed success; his Seventh Sword or King's Blades series might be better gateways)
- C.S. Friedman's _Black Sun Rising_ (zero success)
- Glen Cook's Black Company series (1 for 1)

One other book I would recommend for this purpose, assuming the end of the trilogy in March is as good as the preceding two: Fiona McIntosh's _Myrren's Gift_. She does have one stylistic tic that might make it easier for 'new to epics' readers: characters are sparsely described. If a character is even named, it generally means that they're going to have a scene with a main character at some point. Background characters rarely gets names or even descriptions, just short-hand (the rich merchant, the whore, the soldier, etc.). While the lack of fleshed-out background makes the setting seem somewhat smaller, it does get away from the 'would be nice to have a scorecard' problem I run into occasionally in, say, Martin ("Okay, the four knights and three ladies who just walked in; am I supposed to remember them from somewhere? Someone just addressed 'Fred'; is that the same person as Lord Whosis?")

Brian Gibbons, 12.04.2005, 3:07pm | permalink


How long does a series have to be to be long-epic fantasy? Would one really want to dive into the genre with a series of, say, 10,000 pages? Anyway, here are a couple of multi-volume series that seem fairly epic to me, but aren't heavier than an anvil:

1. Jack Vance's "Lyonesse" Trilogy - "Lyonesse: Suldrun’s Garden" (1983), "Lyonesse II: The Green Pearl" (1985), and "Lyonesse III: Madouc" (1989)?

2. Philip Pullman's fairly recent "His Dark Materials" trilogy - "The Golden Compass", "The Subtle Knife" & "The Amber Spyglass"?

David Carroll, 12.04.2005, 7:09pm | permalink


Brian: The problem with Eddings is really that his characters are preposterous. This isn't something you notice so much as a young teenager, and it's not something that'll bother a lot of adults, but neither is bad-characterization-blindness something I'd count on when making a general recommendation.

Mike Kozlowski, 12.04.2005, 7:22pm | permalink


There are important problems of biased sampling here.

To be qualified to recommend which long series are good, you need to be a special sort of person.

You need to have a lot of time on your hands. Busy people don't read a lot of different long series of fantasy novels.

You need to be tolerant of bad writing. Writers who churn out long series of long novels have it hard. What's the chance they'll meet the repeated deadlines and write well the whole time too?

You need to be tolerant of unreality. When a writer spends ten or fifteen years writing long, long series of long books, what chance does he have to experience the real world? He can write a long series about court intrigues in a monarchy but he doesn't have time to get a government job and watch the office politics. He has to make it up. Luckily, he doesn't have to make it up from scratch. He can build on what he learned from reading other fantasy series. And the readers will know what he's talking about because they read the same series. When you recommend a series to someone who lacks the background, it's probably a good idea to start with YA. These are the things that create the background for the rest. Starting with great works is like going to chinese opera without the background. When a character flutters her fingers you won't know what it means.

Obviously, good candidates for this will fit the same mold. They should be people who have endless time to read fantasy novels. They should be tolerant of bad writing. They should be tolerant of bad plotting and characterization. They should be eager to get immersed in a fantasy that lasts and lasts.

Once you have a good candidate, then you need to guess what sort of fantasy they'd like to get immersed into. John Norman is a special case, for example. His Gor series started out with an interesting premise. An entire society of insane misogynists, and a hero dedicated to reforming that society. A slow-growing colony of giant intelligent ants keeps the human technology primitive and cures everybody of old age. Human men kill each other a lot and keep most of the hordes of women enslaved. Apparently the immortal women stay fertile indefinitely, the birthrate must be fantastic to support the rate of killing.

Interesting plots and lots of immersive M/f BDSM. Then around book 5 the hero is plotting with his girlfriend to change the society, and they're enjoying consensual M/f BDSM, and he starts to notice, she's bossy and argumentative. It would be so much easier to reform the culture if she just did what he wanted. And by book 6 the hero has turned into just another misogynist swordsman. He takes up a variety of other hobbies to kill people over. And it continued for 25 books that keep getting longer, until Mrs. DelRay took the car keys away. Clearly this would be a good place for readers to start if they like M/f BDSM with the occasional switch.

On the other hand, the Wheel of Time series is good for readers who like to read about dominant women spanking submissive women. Although there are lots of subplots that completely get away from that theme.

A beginner could do worse than reading Tarzan. Tarzan has the advantage that many of the unreal characters are animals. Animals who fight to the death in circumstances where anybody with any sense would negotiate or run away. And it appears Burroughs never met a cat. But the stories are a decent introduction, if very short.

Similarly his John Carter of Mars series. The first book can be read as a postmodern masterpiece -- the narrator is clearly unreliable. When he tells Tars Tarkas that Sola is Tars's daughter, he treats it as touching sentimentality and not as lethal blackmail. And whyever would a Helium airship fleet attack Greens in a fortified position? They had no bombs but they didn't retreat, all but one were shot down. Including a granddaughter of the Jeddak of Helium? What disgrace would put her on a fleet with suicide orders? In the end, rather than marrying the crown prince of Zodanga and cementing an alliance with them, she's married to Carter who has the despised caste mark of white skin, Zodanga has been genocided, and the Greem Barbarians are at the gates demanding an alliance. Her father cries.

But a reasonable interpretation of the other nine books is that Carter has been neutralised and is being fed a load of dreams.

The Diskworld series by terry Pratchett might be good. This is a collection of novels all set in the same world. I doubt that there's a single ovverriding plot to make them all fit together, which means there's one less thing to keep track of. People who like to get immersed in that world would have plenty of books to do it with, and not have to worry about missing one of the sequence because the sequence doesn't matter.

J Thomas, 12.05.2005, 7:00am | permalink


I tend to think of ERB's John Carter series as what could be called "rollicking adventure" stories. You're not SUPPOSED to think hard about what's happening or the whole thing falls apart. Just get in and enjoy the ride (or not, if that isn't what you like to do). Sort of an older equivalent of a modern special-effects extravaganza.

Also an additional note about the Discworld novels. Although there isn't a single overriding plot, there are plotlines and characters that connect multiple books and create subseries within the overall set of novels.

Michael I, 12.05.2005, 9:33am | permalink


I think one of the things that's most difficult about introducing new readers to the epic fantasy genre is the intimidating volume of the true epics. I'd recommend starting with something that has the right tone, but isn't quite as long. Duologies or long stand-alones are what come to mind, generally.

Donaldson's Mordant's Need duology might do, especially for female readers as it has a female protagonist. As an added benefit, the protagonist is a non-fantasy reader from our world transplanted to that of the book, so she doesn't understand or expect the trappings of fantasy epics, either. These definitely don't work for everybody, though, so I'd pick it carefully for the reader you know it would work for.

Kay's Tigana has a nice epic feel in just a single, largish book. The Sarantine Mosaic might be good if the new reader has a particular interest in history...and let's face it, most people for whom fantasy work as a genre probably do.

I've had excellent success with Brust's Taltos books, in part because you can read the first several as stand-alone novels, which, along with their manageable individual sizes, eases a lot of the commitment fear that many folks feel.

Epic Fantasy in general, though, is sort of hard to justify a passion in, considering how many of its "canon" series are...uneven, at best. I still feel little guilt for hooking established readers on Martin whenever I can, but I can see how others might hesitate given how his pace has slowed somewhat.

Skwid, 12.05.2005, 11:00am | permalink


Hah! I suggested _Tigana_ as an epic fantasy in one volume and Chad vetoed it as not having the fate of the world at stake. Which is true, but hey--one volume!

My only other suggestion was actually space opera, the Mageworlds books--but they've also got magic, and families and politics and battles and the fate of the Galaxy, plus they're fun. And the first three are complete enough.

Kate, 12.05.2005, 11:19am | permalink


Oh, and Terry Pratchett's Discworld books are *so* not epic fantasy--they start out by taking the piss out of epic fantasy cliches, actually.

I don't agree with J Thomas generally, mind, but this is something I can at least be specific regarding.

Kate, 12.05.2005, 11:21am | permalink


I think the Mordant's Need suggestion is a really good one.

I think that Guy Gavriel Kay's Fionavar Tapestry is also a great idea. I wonder why you think it lacks coherence? Have you posted about this somewhere else that I could read?

I think the Sword of Shanara & the Elfstones of Shanara (Brooks) still stand up well and are good as a "gateway" because their flaws (somewhat derivative, simple themes) won't be noticed by someone not familiar with other fantasy. The danger is of course that the new reader goes on to read his other stuff and then runs screaming from fantasy.

Kathleen, 12.05.2005, 4:18pm | permalink


I was going to mention Malazan but I see you already dealt with it. One thing Erikson's books really have going for them is that the books (especially the early ones) are pseudo-independent so you can get enjoyment from them without reading everything.

Mordant's need is a good choice though I wouldn't reccommend going straight to the Thomas Covenant series afterward.

I'm surprised that Black Sun Rising hasn't done well. I think it is an excellent series, and should be fairly accessible.

Sebastian holsclaw, 12.05.2005, 4:28pm | permalink


Fionavar coherence: It's a gigantic jumble of fantasy tropes mishmashed all together in a way that doesn't exactly fit. Take out the Arthur shit, and it's probably okay, but alas.

Malazan: Malazan is pretty fucking hardcore, though. I don't read it, because I find it frightening and intimidating/silly, and there's no way I'd recommend it to somebody who likes fantasy less than I do.

Mike Kozlowski, 12.05.2005, 6:32pm | permalink


Wow, I just recommended the Malazan books to a very experienced epic fantasy reader, and I still took pains to caution her in advance about the scope and complexity. I would never consider Gardens of the Moon as a book for a newcomer to epic fantasy. Even though, now that Feast of Crows has been a minor letdown, Malazan is safely in first place as my favorite ongoing fantasy epic.

For newcomers, and staying purely with 'epic' fantasy, my response would definately be the Belgarion, if they were young (sub 16). Flaws or no, I've never met a fantasy fan who didn't like it when they were young. Other for younger people are Narnia (which is unquestionably epic fantasy in the early books) and while I've never read them myself I've heard lots of good things about the Redwall series (can anyone confirm?). But in general as fantasy gateway drugs I generally start with Tigana or Jhereg depending on how long a book they look like they can tolerate. Let's face it, there isn't that much epic fantasy that really shows the fantasy genre at its best.

Lou, 12.05.2005, 6:37pm | permalink


Almost all of these suggestions are good ones for fantasy in general, but part of the problem with this specific question is that "epic," to me, denotes a very specific type of series: the whole quest to defeat a Dark Lord sort of story. Things like Brust's Vlad Taltos novels or Moorcock's Elric books don't really work in the same way.

Tigana comes the closest of any of Kay's non-Fionavar works, but I still don't think it works, because the problems are too human in scale. The characters are working for the political liberation of a small number of countries from oppressive human overlords, not to save the entire world from destruction by inhuman evil forces. It's a fabulous book, but it's not "epic" in the sense that I usually think of.

Donaldson's Thomas Covenant books are another possibility that I thought of, but there are so many ways that people bounce off those that have nothing to do with the epic format, that I don't think I'd recommend them.

Chad Orzel, 12.05.2005, 8:50pm | permalink


Michael, if you take _A Princess of Mars_ and look at each detail that doesn't make sense, and imagine what it would take to make it make sense, the whole thing starts to fit together.

First off, everybody lies to John Carter, and he also misunderstands a lot. Dejah Thoris of course tries to manipulate him, though if his memories were right he'd have more chance of successful mating with a lemur than a woman who lays eggs. Since nobody knows what he's thinking, nobody can tell when he's lying. Various people figure out the implications of that right away, they tell him things that he repeats when they aren't around. But somehow it always seems to work out in JC's favor instead of theirs.

The result is a lot like "Cronkheit the Barbarian" but longer and more complex and much funnier. It works. But the later books in the series don't work, or at least the ones I tried didn't.

Kate, is there anything wrong with epic fantasy that takes the piss out of epic fantasy cliches? For new readers? They won't know the difference....

J Thomas, 12.05.2005, 8:51pm | permalink


(1) Discworld is not epic fantasy.

(2) Taking the piss only works when you know the source, otherwise you just stand there feeling bewildered as the jokes fly above your head.

Kate, 12.06.2005, 11:31am | permalink


Since this type of book is right up my alley I will throw in my two cents here. I'm not sure what is distinctive about the longer series other than they involve more characters and have long interwoven plot arcs. Jordan does this more than almost anybody, but the whole thing has gotten out of hand. Martin also epitomizes this so I would recommend him if you don't mind an unfinished story.

*Tolkien, Lord of the Rings. Why start with anything else? Still a great story, memorable characters, unparalleled worldbuilding, and not overly long.

*Martin, A Song of Ice and Fire. Great writing, a gritty, low-magic world where lots of characters die, intricately woven plots.

Jordan, Wheel of Time. Starts out great with a cast of thousands and lots going on but will it ever end?

*Hobb, Assassin and Liveship series. Medieval fantasy that breaks lots of the cliches.

Kay, the Fionavar Tapestry. Kind of a kitchen sink fantasy (crossover from our world, elves and dwarves, Arthur), although intentionally so as Fionavar is supposed to be the original world of which all others are echoes, or something.

*I highly recommend Kay's later books, all of which are slightly disguised versions of real historical settings (Byzantium, 14th c. Spain, etc.), usually with little to no magic, but with intricate plots and lots of characters. His writing and characterization are excellent.

*Tad Williams: Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn. Epic world-building, beautiful writing, but a bit slow to get started.

*Tad Williams: War of the Flowers. Epic in theme if not in size (one large book), this is great, beautiful storytelling in a semi-industrialized faerie world undergoing political and social unrest.

When I was in high school I liked Brooks' original Shanarra trilogy (a Tolkien knockoff if ever there was one), R.A. Salvatore's Dark Elf books (great swordfighting), Weis and Hickman's Dragonlance Saga, and Feist's Magician series, and the Joel Rosenberg Guardians of the Flame books. All of these are similar in trappings (elves, dwarves, wizards) to Tolkien (some by way of Dungeons and Dragons), probably the reason I liked them, but weren't very original in retrospect.

A tie in to the Feist series, but more original was Feist's and Wurts' "* of the Empire" trilogy which centers on a Japan-esque kingdom and its political intrigue.

*Duncan, The King's Blades. Less epic, more swashbuckling, very fun.

I haven't read any other Duncan books but I will have to try some. I also have started Gardens of the Moon, but it got interrupted by A Feast for Crows.

Clay

Clay Blankenship, 12.06.2005, 4:45pm | permalink


Duncan's Handful of Men quartet is genuine epic fantasy, and (I believe at some remove) actually really good. But it's a sequel to the also very good, but not epic, Man of His Word series, so not a good starting point. I guess The Seventh Sword might count as epic, but it's really crossover fantasy, so doesn't seem to fit to me. Same for The Great Game, only more so.

Oddly enough, the main problem with Duncan is that he doesn't feel generic enough to count as real epic fantasy. Real epic fantasy needs to be totally and incredibly Tolkien-derivative, it seems.

Mike Kozlowski, 12.06.2005, 6:15pm | permalink


You can start with the Handful of Men quartet--I did after bouncing off whiny teenagers in the first volume of the Man of His Word books. Ended up liked both series after reading them out of order, too.

Kate, 12.07.2005, 7:14am | permalink


I can't help thinking that there really ought to be something I want to recommend here, but there just isn't (not that I've thought of yet, anyway).

I'm not sure that reading A Handful of Men before A Man of His Word would work for someone not a habitual F&SF reader already, since a lot of background is introduced in the first novel at a reasonable pace. And as noted A Man of His Word is not technically epic (no world-shattering villain to defeat).

I like Mordant's Need but it's not particularly epic, on the same grounds that Tigana isn't - it deals with events in three smallish countries. (It may feel larger than Tigana because the rest of the world doesn't get mentioned at all, but the scale is still small.)

Hobb's Assassin trilogy is very dark and not terribly representative of the genre. Liveship Traders is OK, but very flabby - it needed to be about 2/3 the length it is, and I can see a novice reader getting very bored with it (I was somewhat bored at times myself).

Dan Blum, 12.08.2005, 4:53pm | permalink


I know I may get shat upon here, but for me, my gateway drug into epic fantasy was the first Dragonlance trilogy.

Highly derivitive, but still packed with gnarly ideas, interesting characters and a well-developed world. There is the Evil Overlord, the Plucky Barmaid, the Grumpy Dwarf, the Solemn Knight, etc.

I think they might hold up well....

Rich, 03.20.2006, 6:59am | permalink


I like a lot of the recommendations here, but as a librarian I really have to call foul in some ways. Some of you are defining Epic Fantasy so strictly that it bears little similarity to much of what is considered "epic" tradition.

An Epic isn't neccesarily about going off to kill the bad overlord three kingdoms away like some of you have stated. Epic can also mean dealing with a single kingdom, or possibly two kingdoms.. look at the Illiad versus the Oddysey, the Oddysey fits nicely into your definition of Epic fantasy but the Illiad doesn't since it's about a single war and no real "evil overlord". Court politics are just as rightly epic worthy as long as they feel "epic" in proportion to normal life.

Now, having ranted for a bit, I'll settle down. It just felt like a few people were bashing established epic series based on the fact they didn't have an BBG in them. Remember that Tolkien didn't invent the wheel people, he was great and all but mainly due to his linguistic inventions rather than the fact that he came up with something new... he did the same thing authors are accused of in relation to him...he stole things from other sources, mainly german myths.

I'm curious why Melanie Rawn hasn't been mentioned? It was my gateway drug into not only Epic Fantasy but court politics and really big books as well.

Feel free to email me with flames and debates both:)

Jason Patteson, 21.11.2007, 4:26pm | permalink


btw, my email is pattesonj(at)hotmail.com

I missed the part that said email wouldn't be published, lol.

Jason Patteson, 21.11.2007, 4:27pm | permalink


Add a comment

Name:
E-mail:
Website:
spam-protection, please enter code: captcha, sorry
Comment:
Remember me?

Your e-Mail will not be published,
HTML is permitted

<< home


Saturday, December 03, 2005

Another Couple of Bricks in the Wall

Look! It's not dead!

I have been reading stuff in the last two months, I just haven't been good about blogging it. I'll try to get a few posts up here this weekend, though, so I won't feel like quite so much of a slacker.

The process can be sped up a bit by combining together two books in the Giant Epic Fantasy category: the latest books from Robert Jordan and George R. R. Martin. It's a natural combination in several ways, mostly because they're both gigantic, heavy books that are far enough into their respective series that they can't really be discussed in detail without spoilers. (I'm happy to discuss spoilers in the comments, if anybody still reads this and wants to comment...)

It's a little frightening to realize that Knife of Dreams is the eleventh Wheel of Time book, with at least one more to come. Worse still is the realization that the series has been going on for fifteen years...

At least this volume shows some signs of plot progress. Two extremely annoying subplots, that have dragged on for the last book and a half, finally get resolved, though the resolutions aren't entirely satisfying. There are also some signs and portents from about eight books back that finally come through. And the non-annoying subplot is brought to a fairly successful resolution, which was nice.

As someone else commented, it's the best book in the series in about ten years. Now, granted, it's still a little long on the "Go Away, Scary Robert Jordan Id!" moments-- as a general matter, the reading experience would probably be more pleasant if you just skim any section with a female POV character. But the scene where Mat returns to his troops was terrific, and almost worth the excruciating Elayne plotline. (Really, you're better off skimming those sections...)

As for A Feast for Crows, it shows some worryingly Jordan-esque trends. For one thing, it's famously late in arriving, and what's been published is actually only half of what Martin wrote-- he split the manuscript into two parallel books featuring different subsets of the cast. More worryingly, despite the length, it's a much less eventful book than its predecessor.

Now, granted, some people have written whole series that were less eventful than the previous book, and there are multi-book epics out there with fewer deaths than you'll find in one chapter of A Storm of Swords. But this book is dangerously close to being a let-down rather than a respite, if that makes sense.

Part of the problem is that the characters he's chosen to focus on for this book are among the least interesting in the gigantic cast of the series. As Kate put it, "A whole book of the Lannisters, and no Tyrion? Bleagh." The Cersei point-of-view sections (which I believe appear for the first time in this book) are also much less successful than the Jaime POV sections from the previous book. While the Jaime sections provided some real insight, and go some way toward redeeming his character, Cersei is even more awful from inside her own head. I doubt that was the intent, but that's the effect for me, and it really weakens those sections.

There are some good bits here ("Good boots are hard to find."), but the book is basically seven hundred places of characters being shuffled around to position them for later events. Which is fine as far as it goes, but I can't help thinking about the Wheel of Time series, which started doing that around Book 5, and hasn't really stopped yet. I hope Martin can avoid the same trap, but as a reader, this worries me.

Posted at 10:27 AM | link | 13 comments


Z 682-682.3

orzelc@steelypips.org

Z 674.2-674.5

Syndication
Main Library Page

Z 693-695.83

Archived Posts (Aug. 2004-present)

Older Archive (2001-2004)
Title Index
Author Index
Non-Blog Reviews

CT 3990

About the Author
Japan Stories

QC 1-999

Uncertain Principles

PN 80-99

Arts and Letters Daily
BlogCritics
Book Slut
The Humblest Blog on the Net
Pam Korda
Lundblog
Metacritic: Books
Outside of a Dog
Reading Notes
Seven Things Lately
The Tufted Shoot
Virtual Marginalia
Weasel Words
Woodge's Book Report

PN 101-245

Steven Brust
Neil Gaiman
Making Light
Papersky
Sartorias
Westerblog
Whatever

ML 159-3799

75 or Less Album Reviews
Metacritic: Music
Musical Perceptions
The Onion A.V. Club
The Rest is Noise

PN 1993-1999

Roger Ebert
Flick Filosopher
Metacritic: Film
Rotten Tomatoes

PN 6147-6231

Daily Dinosaur Comics
Fafblog!
Izzle Pfaff
The Poor Man
The Onion
Piled Higher and Deeper
Sluggy Freelance
Something Positive

QA75.5-76.95

Blogtracker
Web Design Group
Weblogs.com


Begun: 7 August, 2001
Re-launched: 21 August, 2004

Weblog posts are copyright 2004 by Chad Orzel, but may be copied and distributed (and linked to) freely, with the correct attribution. But you knew that already.

If you use Internet Explorer, and the text to the right cuts off abruptly at the end of this column, hit "F11" twice, and you should get the rest of it. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Powered by Blogger Pro and BlogKomm.

Technorati Profile

Steelypips main page.